|
In preparation of your CCNA Security 640-553 exam, we want to make sure we cover topics that you are very likely to encounter on your Cisco CCNA exam. So to assist you, below we will discuss the security threats facing modern network infrastructures.
Describe and list mitigation methods for common network attacks
Network attacks can be as varied as the systems that they attempt to penetrate. Without proper protection, any part of any network can be susceptible to attacks or unauthorized activity. Routers, switches, and hosts can all be violated by professional hackers, company competitors,
or even internal employees. Attackers strategically and deliberately choose their targets based on vulnerabilities they have observed, after vulnerability is discovered attackers intended to take advantage of the vulnerability. Individuals and organizations often try to shield themselves from one instance or form of an attack, but they must keep in mind that the attacker can easily shift focus to newly exposed vulnerabilities. The enterprise or organization should always be conscious of designing systems and procedures that eliminate
vulnerabilities and reduce risks.
As per Cisco, there are two major categories of threats to network security:
Internal threats:
These threats typically involve disgruntled former or current employees.
Although internal threats may seem more
ominous than threats from external sources,
security measures are available for reducing
vulnerabilities to internal threats and responding
when attacks occur. Examples are network misuse
and unauthorized access.
External
threats: These threats
consist of structured and unstructured threats originating
from an external source. These threats may have
malicious and destructive intent, or they
may simply be errors that generate a threat. Examples
are viruses and social engineering.
Types
of network attacks:
Reconnaissance
attacks
An intruder attempts to discover and map
systems, services, and
vulnerabilities. Network reconnaissance is the act of
gathering information about a network in preparation for a possible attack.
This information can be garnered from a wide variety of sources. The sources of
information for a reconnaissance attack can include what is called
uncontrollable information, which is information that the network staff cannot
control because it is disseminated to network sweeps and port scans. Some
examples of uncontrollable information include the IP address ranges owned by a
company, which an attacker can determine through the use of the ARIN, RIPE, or
APNIC databases, and domain name ownership information and DNS server IP
addresses, which an attacker can determine by querying network registry databases
such as Network Solutions or Register.com.
Reconnaissance attacks can consist of the
following:
Packet sniffers
Port scans & Ping sweeps
Packer
Sniffer:
It is a software application that uses a
network adapter card in promiscuous mode (a mode in which the network adapter
card sends all packets received on the physical network wire to an application
for processing) to capture all network packets that are sent across a LAN.
Several network applications distribute
network packets in clear text; that is, the information sent
across the network is not encrypted. Because the
network packets are not encrypted, they can be
processed and understood by any application that can
pick them up off the network and process
them.
Packet
Sniffer Attack Mitigation:
The following techniques and tools can be
used to mitigate sniffers attacks:
Authentication—A first option
for defence against packet sniffers is to use strong authentication, such as
one-time passwords.
Switched
infrastructure—Deploy a switched infrastructure to counter the use of
packet sniffers in your environment.
Antisniffer tools—Use these tools to employ software and
hardware designed to detect the use of sniffers on a network.
Cryptography—The most
effective method for countering packet sniffers does not prevent or detect packet
sniffers, but rather renders them irrelevant.
Port Scans and Ping Sweeps: Port scans and ping sweeps are typically
applications built to run various tests against a host or device in order to
identify vulnerable services. The information is gathered by examining IP
addressing and port or banner data from both TCP and UDP ports.
Port Scan and Ping Sweep Attack Mitigation:
If ICMP echo and echo reply are turned off
on edge routers, for example, ping sweeps can be
stopped, but at the expense of network diagnostic
data. However, port scans can easily be run
without full ping sweeps; they simply take longer
because they need to scan IP addresses that
might not be live. IDSs
(Intrusion Detection Systems) at the network and host levels can usually notify
an administrator when a reconnaissance attack is under way. This warning allows
the administrator to better prepare for the coming attack or to notify the
Internet service provider (ISP) that is hosting the system launching the reconnaissance
probe.
Access Attacks:- Access attacks exploit known
vulnerabilities in authentication services, FTP services, and Web services to
gain entry to Web accounts, confidential databases, and other sensitive
information.
Access attacks can consist of the
following:
Password attacks
Trust exploitation
Port redirection
Man-in-the-middle attacks
Password
attacks:
Password attacks can be implemented using
several methods, including brute-force attacks,
Trojan horse programs, IP
spoofing, and packet sniffers. Although packet sniffers and IP
spoofing can yield user accounts and passwords,
password attacks usually refer to repeated
attempts to identify a user account, password, or
both. These repeated attempts are called
brute-force attacks.
Password Attack Mitigation:
Do not allow users to have the same
password on multiple systems—Most users will use the
same password for each system they access, and
often personal system passwords will be the
same as well.
Disable accounts after a specific number of
unsuccessful logins—This practice helps to
prevent continuous password attempts.
Do not use plain-text passwords—Use of
either an OTP or encrypted password is
recommended.
Use “strong” passwords—Many
systems now provide strong password support and can
restrict a user to the use of strong passwords
only. Strong passwords are at least eight
characters long and contain uppercase letters,
lowercase letters, numbers, and special
characters.
Trust
exploitation:
Trust exploitation refers to an
individual’s taking advantage of a trust relationship within a network. The
classic example is a perimeter network connection from a corporation. These
network segments often house DNS, Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP), and
HTTP servers. Because they all reside on the same segment, a compromise of one
system can lead to the compromise of other systems if those other systems in
turn trust systems attached to the same network.
Trust Exploitation Attack Mitigation:
Systems on the outside of a Router should
never be absolutely trusted by systems on
the inside of a Router. Such trust should be
limited to specific protocols and should be
authenticated by something other than an IP address
where possible.
Port Redirection:
Port redirection attacks are a type of
trust exploitation attack that uses a compromised host to
pass traffic through a Router that would
otherwise be dropped.
Port Redirection Mitigation:
Port redirection can be mitigated primarily
through the use of proper trust models, which are
network specific (as mentioned earlier). Assuming
a system under attack, a host-based IDS (Itrusion Detection System) can help detect a hacker and
prevent installation of such utilities on a host.
Man-in-the-Middle Attacks:
A man-in-the-middle attack requires that
the attacker have access to network packets that come
across the network. Such attacks are often
implemented using network packet sniffers and
routing and transport protocols. The possible uses
of such attacks are theft of information,
hijacking of an ongoing session to gain access to
your internal network resources, traffic analysis
to derive information about your network and
its users, denial of service, corruption of
transmitted data, and introduction of new information into network
sessions.
Man-in-the-Middle
Attack Mitigation:
Man-in-the-middle attacks can be
effectively mitigated only through the use of cryptography (encryption).
Denial
of Service Attacks:
DoS attacks are not aimed at gaining access to
a network or the information on a network but rather at making a service or a
network unavailable to legitimate users. DoS attacks
fall into two general categories:
DoS attacks can consist of the following:
IP spoofing
Distributed denial of service (DDoS)
IP
Spoofing:
An IP spoofing attack occurs when an
attacker outside your network pretends to be a trusted
computer, either by using an IP address that is
within the range of IP addresses for your network
or by using an authorized external IP address
that you trust and to which you wish to provide
access to specified resources on your network.
IP
Spoofing Attack Mitigation
The threat of IP spoofing can be reduced,
but not eliminated, through the following measures:
• Access control—The
most common method for preventing IP spoofing is to properly configure access
control.
• RFC 2827 filtering—Prevent any outbound
traffic on your network that does not have a source address in your
organization’s own IP range.
• Require additional authentication that
does not use IP-based authentication—Examples of this technique include the
following:
– Cryptographic (recommended)
– Strong, two-factor, one-time passwords
DoS and DDoS Attacks
DoS attacks are different from most other
attacks because they are not targeted at gaining access
to your network or the information on your
network. These attacks focus on making a service
unavailable for normal use, which is typically
accomplished by exhausting some resource
limitation on the network or within an operating
system or application. These attacks require
little effort to execute because they typically
take advantage of protocol weaknesses or because
the attacks are carried out using traffic that
would normally be allowed into a network. DoS
attacks are among the most difficult to completely
eliminate because of the way they use
protocol weaknesses and “native” traffic to attack
a network.
DDoS attacks are the “next generation” of DoS attacks on the Internet. This type of attack is not
new—UDP and TCP SYN flooding, Internet Control
Message Protocol (ICMP) echo request
floods, and ICMP directed broadcasts (also known
as smurf attacks) are similar—but the scope
certainly is new. Victims of DDoS
attacks experience packet flooding from many different
sources, possibly spoofed IP source addresses,
that bring their network connectivity to a grinding
halt. In the past, the typical DoS attack involved a single attacker’s attempt to flood a
target host
with packets. With DDoS
tools, an attacker can conduct the same attack using thousands of
systems.
DoS and DDoS
Attack Mitigation
The threat of DoS
attacks can be reduced through the following three methods:
• Antispoof features—Proper
configuration of antispoof features on routers and Routers
• Anti-DoS features—Proper configuration of anti-DoS features on routers and Routers
• Traffic
rate limiting—Implement traffic rate limiting with the network’s ISP
Hopefully you found this Cisco CCNA Security 640-533 article helpful as you progress toward your CCNA certification. You will find that the hands-on experience you gain with our CCNA certification kits is the best way to really solidify the various CCNA concepts in your brain. So please check out our various kits and other free CCNA certification material.
|